Archive for the 'Technology' Category

Now virtual education…

charukesi November 2nd, 2007

The last time I wrote on this, I had over a hundred comments, most of them from “post-graduates with teaching skills” (but not terribly good spelling skills, I may add), all of them asking me for details on that - but here goes anyway, from new York Times - Hello, India? I Need Help With My Math on how while the tutees are all over the world (seeking help with math and whatever else), the tutor is in India. But then, why not? Read - from the same newspaper - Classroom of the Future Is Virtually Anywhere.

Skirting the criminal

charukesi October 23rd, 2007

First there were pepper sprays and karate moves - The Age now writes about this Japanese skirt to ward off crime [link via textually - where a tenuous link has been established between this piece of news and the main focus of their blog - mobile phones!] - quoting from an article in the age - the above skirt serves as a disguise, by converting a person into a vending machine, to elude pursuers - Now I cannot honestly say that I know how this works - woman stops for a second, opens her skirt and lo! turns into a Cola vending machine - and lo! lo! pursuer is left baffled?

svSKIRT_wideweb__470x186,0-1

And how about this - Take the “manhole bag”, a purse that can hide your valuables by unfolding to look like a round sewer cover. Put it on the street with your wallet still inside, and unwitting thieves are supposed to walk right by.

A phone booth for Superwoman now? All I can say is I hope the women don’t end up drinking all that Cola and finding themselves unable to fit into the skirt the next time they need it.

Software for divorce now

charukesi August 13th, 2007

Software to ease divorce pains, says this article on Smart Mobs - i read through it looking for signs of irony but no, this is serious. (The researchers’) divorce software is designed to handle negotiations. ‘Family Winner’ and ‘Family Mediator’ mix ‘artificial intelligence, game theory and an electronic or human external mediator to help divorcing couples settle their disputes in a fair and rational manner.’

Well, I did find some irony - I don’t know whether it was intended - the post is filed under ‘Technologies of Cooperation’ - why the divorce at all then?

Wired!

charukesi December 7th, 2006

Here I am, back on my blog after a long while. And this time, I am blogging from the train, on my way to Chennai from Kakinada. Plug points in every cubicle. And next to it, bold letters saying, for laptops and mobile phones.

DSC00062

(And this pic from the mobile phone, transferred directly on to the laptop through the data cable and so on. Yawn.)

This time last year, and I was wheelchairing to Kakinada via Vizag… I managed to stay “connected” with the world outside (read, my mail and my blog) and my husband with his week old job then through the very moody Reliance mobile cable connection. And in the years before that, autorickshaw trips to the main “junction” in the town to find an internet cafe (bring on the capuccino, kids) that was open and had a free seat for us in all those semi-closed cramped cubicles where earnest young engineering gradutes wrote to prospective employers (always in the US of A) through their yahoo mail accounts and other equally earnest perspiring young men stared at the screen, bewitched while keeping another nervous but steady eye behind them…

Point is, technology and all that… that stuff we take for granted, but not always accessible to everyone… and the small innumerable ways in which we have adapted to it. An architect I met last week in Mumbai was speaking about tech-friendly homes, and described to me all manners of innovation he adds to homes he creates that makes life, in his words, so much easier for the occupants, without them having to do anything major, or sometimes even realizing it. He mentioned the analogy of personal clothing - now we have companies like Levis that make jeans with separate pockets for ipods. Ipod pockets!, I thought…

And then I landed in Chennai last week and on my way towards the city from the airport, I saw a large hoarding for the world’s first sari with a pocket. A mauve silk sari draped oh-so-perfectly around an enviably slim waist, and just below the waist, ta da! a pocket, and a mobile phone peeping out of it. Camera not at hand, I could not stop in the mad traffic. But here it is, for your viewing pleasure… (as the gods say, google and you shall find)

sari

And here is Pavithra Srinivasan on Chennai metblogs with more practical concerns in pocket bonanza

Mobile phones : does size matter?

charukesi April 26th, 2006

Mobile phones. At first large and comfortable, brick-like. Then suddenly as in everything else, small was beautiful - mobile phones got smaller and slicker. And now, I find mobile phones, especially higher end versions becoming large again. People want to pay for a phone that looks ugly and is unwiedly to carry around - and I wonder if most such mobile phone owners even know of or use other than basic applications on their phone…?

This interesting article from informationweek says - people are turning to mobile phones for Internet use more quickly than they’re adopting laptops for the same purpose in many parts of the world - large for a phone but very small and compact for a personal computer. [link through putting people first]

Welcome to mobile-phones-meet-personal-computers…

But coming back to my initial thought, do people actually use the enhanced features or applications that they pay a premium for? I was reading about the “paradox of enhancement” in a paper titled The Upgraded Digital Divide: Are We Developing New Technologies Faster than Consumers Can Use Them? - When people are considering buying next-generation products, they find the bells and whistles attractive and decide to make the purchase, but when they acquire the products, they find the complexity of the new features overwhelming and end up using only the products’ basic features.

In other words, people may buy a higher end version of a product, fascinated by the “add-ons” - they may actually serve as a status symbol (the class diferentiator, so to say), but with the product in their hands, may not aware of all these extras, or find them relevant at all. And this sometimes leads to what has been called ‘technology dissonance’ - what did I pay for? I wonder if this is happening with mobile phones too…

[cross-posted on mindspace]

On blogging and the future of the internet

charukesi April 13th, 2006

When you have nothing to say, link it…

Or post photographs. Or cartoons from other blogs.

Like this great one :

blogger

[from blog discovery of the day - what blog men!]

***

Elsewhere :

The Future of the Internet on red herring. If Mr. Cerf and about two dozen other pundits Red Herring interviewed about the future of the Internet are right, in 10 years’ time the barriers between our bodies and the Internet will blur as will those between the real world and virtual reality.

And a lot more… Definitely read it.

Maid in India

charukesi March 13th, 2006

Can someone who doesn’t even know how to read or write use a computer? Microsoft Corp. is probing that question at a research lab in India.

Microsoft seeking ways to help illiterate. That is promising.

And then this…

Working with a local advocacy group, Microsoft has developed a prototype of a system that would connect illiterate domestic workers in India with families seeking their services. The system uses pictures, video and voice commands to tell women what jobs are available, how much the jobs pay and where they are.

Read the full report.

I have mixed feelings about this one, most of them not so good. I am very excited about the possibilities that such systems could open up - bringing those with less access (illiterate or otherwise) closer to information in some way. echoupal does that now (although that is not a project aimed at the illiterate).

Here are some of my reasons for the not-so-good feelings :

Willingness to learn

The fantastic hole-in-the-wall experiment has shown that it is indeed possible for someone who does not know how to read or write to use a computer. But they in this experiment are children, they are naturally curious about the world around them, they are willing to experiment and to make fools of themselves in the process.

Human interaction v/s machine gobbledygook

But why domestic workers? In a country like India, the word-of-mouth system works best - I need a maid, I tell the watchman in my building, he tells others and the next morning three women are at the door-step. I do not have a fixed idea about how much I will pay for the job, not a series of tasks that I can put up on a computer.

Is there a need?

And in most places, there is a decent, well-balanced demand-supply system in place, unlike perhaps the larger employment market. Given that, I do not understand why either a potential employer or employee will need to or want to use such a system.

What is the benefit?

echoupal benefits the farmer by eliminating the middleman, the farmer has updated knowledge about prices and market trends and makes beter money for his produce. In case of domestic workers, there are no middlepeople(?)

Where does the twain meet?

The researchers say they are now trying to figure out how to implement the system, since most women who do domestic work don’t own computers. One option is to put up a kiosk in a community center, Toyama said. Er, most women, meaning some of them do? And what about those wishing to employ them - do they all own computers? If not, do they also go to a kiosk? How does communication work if both sender-receiver are not on a shared platform - any kind of platform?

I think the concept is interesting and powerful, but fraught with all the questions and that leapfroggers tend to evoke in those watching. As a confimed leapfrogger-cheerer, I’d be very happy to read somewhere the answers to these questions. In the meanwhile, here is a blasphemous suggestion - can time at Microsoft research be perhaps put to better use?

Mobile phones and potato-onions

charukesi January 9th, 2006

Some people never learn - make that some companies. Remember how Reliance mobile had started out in India - with those “dealers” who sold you the mobile phone and then vanished - or if were present, had no clue about handling after-sales queries and complaints? Remember how Reliance called them not dealers but entrepreneurs under the “Dhirubhai Ambani Entrepreneur” scheme? And remember how quickly Reliance had to pull that “entrepreneurship” scheme out of the market and launch their own sales and service outlets?*

Like I was saying, some companies never learn - the always interesting and informative textually informs us that Reliance is planning to sell their phones through vegetable vendors.

“A joint marketing penetration effort by CDMA-based telephony operators ñ Reliance Infocomm and Tata Teleservices Ltd (TTSL), the initiative would involve training of the owners of vegetable and grain mandis to demonstrate and sell the product, and to provide after sales services. Reliance Infocomm would sell its product and services through vegetable and grain mandis, cable operators and farm product vendors, like irrigation pumps and tractor dealers.”

Arrey bhai, yeh mobile ek kilo ka bhaav kitna?

In simple words, no Reliance, selling is not enough. Back-end support is crucial.

***
*In case you don’t remember, here is a detailed article on Reliance’s master-plan and how it boomeranged on the company.

Mousewives and email users

charukesi January 4th, 2006

Came acorss this recent report from the Pew internet and American Life project… For what claims to be a ‘wide-ranging study’, the report seems to me full of stereotypes-exist-therefore-will-reinforce statements and worse, “findings” which really say nothing new…

A wide-ranging look at the way American women and men use the internet shows that men continue to pursue many internet activities more intensively than women, and that men are still first out of the blocks in trying the latest technologies.

Among other things, we are told that women like to chat, use email, forward jokes and are are more likely to feel satisfied with the role email plays in their lives, especially when it comes to nurturing their relationships. And even in email, women tend to use it more for personal communication while men communicate with various kinds of organizations. And indicentally, men also use the internet more to search for information, are more tech-savvy and more interested in technology generally…

Woman the gossipy nurturer and man the intelligent provider - can never go wrong…

But where are the insights? Dimensions that have changed (since the last report, in the last few years, whatever), trends that are being seen, and things that can be expected in the future…?

Somehow, this report reminded me of another study I had read about on Lorenz’s Antropologi a while ago… From housewife to mousewive - Anthropological study on women and Internet (although Lorenz does wonder about exactly how anthropological the study was)

A recent anthropological study (combined with nationwide polling) by Demos shows the traditional housewife has been transformed into a ‘mousewife’ as women drive forward the increasing use of computers in the home.

The democratic model on wikipedia

charukesi October 19th, 2005

BusinessWeek’s Blogspotting asks Does Wikipedia need editors and points to a post on Nicholas Carr’s blog. The law of the wiki is an interesting dicsussion on the idea of ‘quality’ on wikipedia. Here he suggests that posts on arcane topics are better than those on general topics, since only people with some specialized knowledge and interest contribute to the former while any individual with a mouse in hand can add his ‘two cents’ worth to the latter. While this sounds plausible, I find that I refer to wikipedia only for information on the general / broader topics - more as a quick reference source rather than a reliable one. Even in case of topics requiring specialized knowledge, I have no way of knowing who - and with what level of expertise - contributed to the article.

In other words, the example of Wikipedia actually undercuts, rather than supports, the Web 2.0 tenet of “collective intelligence.” It reveals that collectivism and intelligence are actually inversely correlated. Leading to what he calls the “collective mediocrity trap”.

Apart from just mediocre or plain inferior information, wikipedia presents the opportunity for another quality issue - that of information / knowledge that is selective and manipulative in nature (even given that all knowledge is selective and can be used to manipulate!). Where does information stop and propaganda begin? There are all kinds of nuts out there brimming with their pet ideas on their preferred politics, religion, cause…

As information becomes more and more open and across the internet, the need for control mechanisms become sharper. Personally for me, the idea of such a huge information source created, totally depending on the responsible and mature behavior of millions of end users, is amazing. As a completely democratic source of information, is wikipedia a viable model in its present form?

Says Carr, If Wikipedia wants to achieve it’s goal of being “authoritative,” I think it will have to abandon its current structure, admit that “collective intelligence” makes a pretty buzzphrase but a poor organizational model, and define and impose some kind of hierarchical power structure. In which case, it does not remain a wiki… A rather dramatic dilemma - democracy without accountability or control with quality?

Next »